Log in    

Archive for the 'Barack Obama' Category

McCain’s Acceptance Speech

Art Smith September 5th, 2008

A lot of you have seen the speech, some have not.  Overall, high marks for contents.  Very high.  I think he brought out the right issues, positions, and comparisons with Obama.  He’s working out the differences, which he needs to continue to do.  Probably the three key areas that he addressed and should continue to address:

  1. Key distinctions between Democrats and Republicans on social and economic issues.
  2. Demonstrable track record in leading and doing the right thing both in policy and ethical behavior.
  3. Bipartisan attitude and effort in pooling ideas and working with all sides to find the best solutions.

Clearly, the convention floor was energized.  I would say (as others have also said) that the presentation was not as strong as the content.  I’d have to give John a B- for presentation.  However, the apex of the speech, the culmination of his message of “fighting”, was well executed and effective.  The key to that was pushing through the speech at that point without stopping despite the applause, cheers, and revelry.

So, some thoughts on key pieces of the speech.

On Sarah Palin:

“I’ve found the right partner to shake up Washington, DC.”

I don’t recall ever seeing so much of a speech by a Presidential nominee devoted to the Vice-Presidential nominee.  Very cool.  Sending the right message right up front that Sarah has John’s 100% support, that they are a team with  common mission, and that the mission is one that Americans have been begging for now for decades.  Clean up the Swamp… obviously, Pelosi is unable to.

“I don’t work for a Party, I don’t work for a special interest, I don’t work for myself.  I work for you.”

This will be one of the key messages of the campaign, from what I can tell.  I’m not 100% behind a message of the President acting as a “representative” of the will of the people.  Sometimes, the President is going to have to do some unpopular things and be okay with the consequences, just as Bush has done.  Regardless, the intended and probably heard message here is that John considers himself beholden to no other men of power than those than elect him, and that is refreshing, contraintuitive (for most politicians), and effective.

“We lost the trust of the American People… we’re going to change that.”

Honesty about the major errors made by members of his own party.  This is probably where “cleaning up Washington” is going to be the most effective message, in declaring that ethical failings have been bipartisan, and that the cleanup will be as well.  This may not make some Republican leaders very happy, and hopefully the American people will get the fact that this is a big risk for McCain.

“Education is the Civil Rights issue of this century.  … Empower parents with choice [in education options].”

One of the distinctions of Republians vs. Democrats: Republicans want options for families and accountability for the educators.  My favorite line:

“… Help bad teachers find another line of work.”

He also stated that he wants to help good educators to be as effective as possible, removing barriers and compensatnig them appropriately.

“I will reach out my hand to anyone to help me get this country moving again.”

If McCain is elected, he may become known as the most bipartisan and effective president in decades.  This will undoubtedly be more difficult than the work he’s done on the House and Senate floors, but he’s willing.

“Get back up and fight again for my country and for the men I had the honor to serve with because every day they fought for me.”

This was a quote from his comrad in the POW camp after John had been broken.  This should become a metafor to challenge America to fight on, and why.  At the end of the speech, John makes that so.

“Nothing brings greater happiness in life than to serve a cause greater than yourself.”

Both candidates are probably going to repeat this kind of rhetoric (I suspect McCain is more likely to speak truthfully of this, but that’s just my opinion) because they know that many in our nation resonate with this statement.  However, I doubt that enough people really do sometimes.  The fact is, so many Americans are focused on themselves and their personal challenges (and granted, many of them are in real need, so that is understandable).  We have had a couple of generations move into voting age these past couple of decades, where the priorities are very “me” centered.  There are some, but few, who truly think of others before themselves.  This is one of the core areas of decay in our society.  If McCain, Obama, or both of them can influence and self-centered electorate to look outside themselves as they consider what is best for America, this will be a profoundly positive and successful election regardless of who wins.

“I’m going to fight for my cause every day as your president. I’m going to fight to make sure every American has every reason to thank God, as I thank him: that I’m an American, a proud citizen of the greatest country on Earth, and with hard work, strong faith and a little courage, great things are always within our reach. Fight with me. Fight with me.

“Fight for what’s right for our country!

“Fight for the ideals and character of a free people!

“Fight for our children’s future!

“Fight for justice and opportunity for all!

“Stand up to defend our country from its enemies!

“Stand up for each other; for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America!

“Stand up, stand up, stand up and fight! Nothing is inevitable here! We’re Americans, and we never give up! We never quit! We never hide from history! We make history!”

This was the high-point of the speech.  The crowd was going nuts through the whole paragraph, and John never faltered… he pushed right through and allowed the crowd to keep building and building to a crescendo that climaxed in my heart, and hopefully many many others as well.

If ever our country and the Republican Party needed this kind of encouragement it is now.  As a country, we have struggled through 18 months or more of growing challenges that have impacted the worlds of so many people with the loss of homes, jobs, financial stability.  Despite the continued success of the action in Iraq (or perhaps because of it), we have not been allowed as a country to stir to a real sense of the victory we are experiencing there.  We don’t understand why so many people around the world hate us.  And we are hurting more and more as our differences in political philosophy create a greater divide than I have ever seen.

As a Party, we are somewhat demoralized because of the losses in 2006.  We are frustrated because the answers to our economic and energy problems seem so clear and yet refuted unendingly in the village square, in the press, in the ears of our representatives in Congress.  We are angry because even when we’ve had control of Congress and the White House, we failed to get our agenda through.  We don’t think we have a chance of winning the US Congress or many of our state legislatures this year.  And we’re still not confident of our prospects of keeping the White House.

And as a result, many, many, many people seem like they are ready to give up.  It’s frustrating to watch.

John says: “Fight!”.  And I agree.

When things appear to be at their worst, we must fight.  We must for the sake of our country, for our children, for future generations.  Else we dishonor the generations past who fought for us.

The rally cry of this campaign needs to be “Fight!”.

Bithead has a great review of the choice now before us.

There is a great deal more that John said in his speech.  You can read the transcript here.

Sphere: Related Content

McCain’s Big Night

Art Smith September 4th, 2008

Just a few minutes away from John McCain’s big speech.

It will be interesting to see how it compares to Palin’s.

David Gergen at CNN is apparently a little bit disconnected as HE stated that others were disconnected who said that Democrats were running Washington.  Gergen’s perspective is apparently that the party of the President dictates who runs Washington, as he says that “Republicans have been running Washington for the last 8 years.”  That doesn’t work for me.

Democrats have held Congress for the last 2 years.  Gergen’s comments were very misleading.

Of course, if you don’t acknowledge the power of Congress today as held by liberal Democrats, you get to ignore the fact that the severe demise of our economy has occurred while Democrats controlled Congress.

The MSM will have us believe what they want us to believe to get more and more liberal control of the government.

Journalism’s demise has been a longstanding disappointment for me.  I had majored in Journalism briefly in college, and I produced a daily 30 minute radio news program at my college for a semester.  I dropped the Journalism major after taking a class in “Journalistic Ethics”.  Seriously, the class was a disappointment as I discovered that, at least in the school setting, the title was an oxymoron.

Anyhow, there’s little hope of seeing the Press act objectively and outside the news.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Tonight’s speech is going to be important not only because of the drive for the McCain-Palin ticket, but for the need to have Republicans take back control of Congress and get us out of this misery.

It’s going to take some work.  McCain needs to do what he can to help as well.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Palin’s speech last night really knocked the socks off of a lot of people… watched by over 37 million people.  Everyone I talked to who saw the speech was really impressed.

Sarah is scaring the Left, including Obama who took the time to make some public comments about Palin today in an attempt to distract from the Republican Convention events.  Listening to his comments, it sounds like he’s confused and unsure how to articulate serious thoughts.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I will not have time to comment tonight on McCain’s speech.   I need to get some sleep.  Tomorrow sometime I’ll comment.

By the way, Cindy McCain is speaking… pretty darn good.  She’ll make a great First Lady.  Great family story.

Sphere: Related Content

Gustav Gives Us An Obama Dry Run

Renea Smith September 1st, 2008

My husband has been after me to contribute my thoughts to his blog instead of just hashing them out with him. After reading the story “Obama: My donors can help victims” in the Des Moines Register today, I decided it was time.

I confess I was taken in by Obama’s message of change. I believe our country and both the Democratic and Republican parties are all at a crossroads which will determine a lot of things for the future. While we may still be considered a “superpower” in military might, we have sadly lagged behind the rest of the world in education, economic growth and dare I say the overall physical health of Americans. We do have a great health care system and I wouldn’t trade it for anyone else’s, but we need it as we grow fatter and fatter sitting on our butts. The times are a changing, and who is best to lead us through?

I’ve been careful to not pay much attention to the media’s spin, but to listen to the candidates themselves. I watched the Saddleback forum and listened to an educated man begin each sentence with “Well…” Great way to showcase our education system. And I finally saw that his message of change doesn’t have any substance behind it. He has not given one specific as to how he is going to bring about change.

Back to today’s article in the Des Moines Register (CBS’s Maria Gavrilovic also references some of this) about Gustav and helping the people of the Gulf Coast. Obama is quoted as saying, “I think we can get tons of volunteers to travel down there, if it becomes necessary,” and “I think we can activate an e-mail list of a couple of million people who want to give back.” Let’s see…do I want a president who thinks we can… or do I want a president who can, who takes action knowing mistakes may and probably will be made, but is decisive nonetheless?

The comment, however, that threw me over the edge is, “we don’t want to solicit a bunch of canned goods that can’t get there, or, you know, bottles of water where they already have water.” Hey, Obama, ever hear of potable water? I’m sure the people of the Gulf Coast are grateful to drink and bathe in the disgusting water that Gustav brings ashore. Also, if volunteers are traveling down to help, why can’t they take canned goods with them? I’ll even throw in a can opener for good measure. Now, whether or not canned goods are the best thing to be sending to the Gulf Coast is a valid question, but to be concerned about getting them there, I don’t think that would really be a problem.

Seems like Gustav has given us a dry run, so to speak, for us to see who has the skills to lead the country.

Sphere: Related Content

GOP Convention Day 1 Preview: Bare Bones

Art Smith August 31st, 2008

Due to events surrounding the imminent landfall of hurricane Gustav, Monday’s Republican National Convention activities will be toned down substantially. John McCain has requested that only the minimum required activities under the Party’s rules be conducted, eliminating prime-time broadcasting… official business probably only running from 3:00 PM to 5:30 PM.

President Bush and Vice-President Cheney will not be showing up for the convention as they stay focused on the pressing impact of the weather in the Gulf.  President Bush had been scheduled to speak on Monday night.

The New York Times story tells us:

Amid extraordinary circumstances that remain extremely uncertain, many questions remain unanswered, including whether Mr. McCain and Mrs. Palin will actually appear at the convention here to accept their party’s nominations and what the schedule might look like for the rest of what had been expected to be a four-day political coronation for Mr. McCain and his vice presidential nominee.

Events are going to be worked out day-to-day.  McCain is asking corporations that were involved in helping finance this week’s events to help raise money for relief efforts that will almost certainly be needed in Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, and other parts of the Gulf Coast.

I suspect that although the storm itself could not have been orchestrated, it may have come as a relief to McCain and other Party leaders to be able to graciously drop the sitting President from the program, since it seems that further association with Bush only antagonizes everyone.  Which is unfortunate, but there it is.

It will be interesting to see whether McCain and Obama try to “out-Presidential” each other during this crisis.  Especially since we do have a real President as well.

It will also be interesting to see how much partisan campaigning goes on this week.  Johnathon Martin today referenced some comments from Rick Davis, McCain’s Campaign Manager, responded to a reference to Obama campaign comments today with:

“So he attacks us while there’s a hurricane going on and John McCain suspends his convention basically. What bigger contrast can you have about putting your country first?”

Keep an eye on both campaigns, and compare how they behave this week.  It may be telling.

Meanwhile, Gustav has killed scores of people in the Carribean.  The outer band of the storm has started pelting rain in southern Lousiana, and landfall of the main body of the storm is expected Monday morning.

We should all keep an eye on what’s happening there and be ready to do what we can to help.

Sphere: Related Content

More Thoughts On Palin

Art Smith August 30th, 2008

The Left is going absolutely bonkers over the selection of Sarah Palin to run for Vice-President on the GOP ticket.

There’s also a lot of negative comments coming from the Right, although not quite as emotionally charged as those from the Left.

Christopher Patton of The Podium, aka DI Blog (that is, Daily Iowan, I believe) had a great sample headline which read “Sarah Palin is a Far-Right Ideologue“.   Right off I love the headline because it tells me we’ve got the right message coming out.   Patton is great reading if you’re looking for some reasoned content from the Left.  He manages to hit great points, which to someone from the Left sounds like heresy, and to someone on the Right sounds like Heaven.  Example:

Rather than yammering on about whether Sarah Palin was a “smart choice” for John McCain’s running mate, the media should be focusing on whether she has a history of making smart choices. She doesn’t.

For one thing, Palin denies that greenhouse gas emissions from human industrial activity are causing climate change.

Go Sarah!!! We are definitely on the right track!!!

Patton goes on to complain about her support of teaching Creationism in public schools along side of Evolution.  I still remember (back in the early 70’s) when the fight was to allow Evolution to be taught along side Creationism.

Patton doesn’t bother with hitting her Pro-life position, which is probably tearing up many moderates who were hoping for a Pro-choice pick by McCain.

Don’t forget, Sarah wants to drill in ANWR. Bad for the Left, good for the Right.

And he also mentions that she has no foreign policy positions.  I doubt that’s actually true, although she may lack foreign policy experience, but I’m sure we’ll see more of her positions on everything over the next few months.

But I must take the time to contradict the initial point made by Christopher: he says she doesn’t have a history of making smart choices.  I would say she’s made a number of great choices, but significant is this one: confronting the scourge of corruption in her own party.  That is gutsy and will sell well with Americans.  Perhaps not so much with the GOP leadership, which suffers with the same integrity issues at all levels of the party and elected officials as does the Democratic Party.

McCain has always been known as a man of integrity.  He has never taken an earmark while in Congress.  He has fought for stronger rules to protect Congressmen/women from undue influence, and he was one of the minority (which included Clinton and Obama) in the Senate that voted in favor of suspending earmarks earlier this year.

Palin supplements this core value system of staying away from corruption and has succeeded in thwarting part of this offense from Alaska politics.  Cleaning up our Government can become a core mission of this campaign.  My wife said today that Obama wants an undefined change that no one can grasp.  McCain/Palin want change that dramatically improves our confidence in the government, perhaps allowing us to see a day where might be able to trust our politicians more.  Change that drives Congress to make choices that really solve the problems that Americans face.  Change that motivates departments throughout government to cut graft, wasted expense, and focus on meeting their own missions as efficiently as possible. Change that brings us smaller government.

Change that allows us to work and thrive without having to depend on the Government for handouts and tax breaks.

That’s the kind of change America needs.  That’s the kind of change that I know John and Sarah are going to work to provide us.

And that’s looks smart to me.

More info about Sarah Palin in the MSNBC video below.

Sphere: Related Content

The Obama Nomination

Art Smith August 27th, 2008

Well, it’s official.  Barack Obama is now the first African American (am I supposed to still say that, or am I supposed to say “black” now?  I can’t get this Political Correctness down right it seems) to be nominated by a major party for President, as long as you don’t include Warren Harding, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, and Calvin Coolidge.

Oh, that list surprised you?  If so, you may want to watch this video:

Regardless of whether the information in the video is true of not, Obama certainly IS the first person to receive the presidential nomination of a major party BECAUSE he is African American.

I am, in one regard, happy to see a person of color nominated.  Witnessing an historic event of this nature is certainly breathtaking.  I will also be happy the day a woman is nominated.  Any perception that walls or ceilings preventing any member of our society from becoming President needs to be crushed.

And getting past these historic milestones will also allow our country, which seems to have lost its aggregate mind, to get its focus back (if it ever was) on electing people for better reasons than: skin-color, gender, ethnicity, religion, age or Kennedy-ness.

Maybe we can move on to electing people because they will represent the interests and opinions of our country effectively.  Or because they will defend our people and the Constitution.  Or because they are interested in seeing the country prosper.

Barack Obama is not the right person to lead our country.  There is no evidence whatsoever that he has ever done anything effective in his political career.  A Coke and a smile are not going to do the hard job of addressing the current ills facing us and creating a strategy for long-term growth in our economy.

John McCain has what is needed to work toward the right policies to cut spending, protect our borders, stimulate our economy, finish the work in Iraq, eliminate our dependence on foreign oil, and keep our liberties safe from the growing solicialist mindset that is infiltrating the Democratic party.

Congratulations, Barack.  Don’t start measuring for drapes just yet.

Sphere: Related Content

Why Party Unity Matters

Art Smith August 24th, 2008

Democrats for decades have been struggling with the inner turmoil of diverse political positions which have kept their party from setting a course that all Democrats can get behind.  And this partly why that party has bled so many conservative Democrats to vote for Republican Presidents.

Obama has succeeded in achieving the role of presumptive Democratic nominee for President by keeping his message as vague as possible, by pandering to specific interest groups as needed, and by establishing who he is not.  But it is not clear what part of the party he really aligns with.

This week will definitely tell the tale of how well he can lead and influence the grassroots Democrats who will be attending the Democratic National Convention.  He’s already mentioned that he’s added content to the party platform (supposedly to limit late-term abortions).  Will convention-goers be receptive to those changes?

And, as Ted Van Dyk asks in a piece this weekend in the Wall Street Journal, will Obama be able to bring “Reagan Democrats” back home?  Interestingly enough, as the nation has become more educated, it has not necessarily swung in either the left or right direction dramatically except for bursts of elections of Presidents (where in the past 40 years we have seen mostly Republican Presidents).

The fact is, there is a large pool of voters, some of whom call themselves Independents, some of whom call themselves Republicans and tend to have liberal thinking about some social issues, and some of whom call themselves Democrats and have a series of issues (I think both social and fiscal) where they are conservative.  Probably the biggest issue for many of these people is that they don’t feel either party is really speaking to them.

And that’s alright.

Except of course for the fact that the Democratic Party has struggled so badly over the last 40 years with dramatic infighting which will likely continue through this week, and in most elections cycles has kept them from hitting a home run on the Presidential level.  Obviously, Carter and Clinton are the exceptions.  But it appears that, as Van Dyk tells us, that many Democrats perceive a party significantly divided:

Since 1968, independent and on-the-fence voters have come to perceive that there are, in fact, two Democratic Parties represented by two kinds of candidates. There is the middle-income, middle-minded, socially more conservative, bread-and-butter Democratic Party. Then, there is the better-educated, higher-income, socially liberal Democratic Party. The candidates of these wings do not have their feet wholly in one camp or another. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton campaigned successfully as undefined populists, and benefited from weak Republican opposition. But as a rule, Democratic presidential candidates have not since 1968 been able to restore the party that was broken that year. Lyndon Johnson, in 1964, was the last Democratic presidential candidate to gain a national majority of white voters.

As much as I’m afraid to say this, what I’m seeing this year, while in fact many (including myself) would emphatically state that race or sex are not obstacles to voting for a candidate, this year’s election will be cast as a year of racial divide in America as Barack Obama is almost certain to continue the tradition of not getting the majority of white votes.  And it will be perceived as an even greater American friction if he wins in that case.  And a friction that may even exist within his own party.  How well he brings Democrats together this week may spell either the success of demise of his campaign.

For either party, it would be well to jettison the truly extreme factions in order to ensure the solid base knows it can expect the kind of conservative or liberal core values that each of these two parties has stood for over the decades.  We are already moving deeply into a divide between major philosophies of governing, and it is imperative that we have ample opportunity to engage in meaningful discourse.  I’m afraid that four or five major views will become confusing for most (including me) and we will not succeed within the context of two major parties.  If we have 5 major positions on most social and fiscal issues, perhaps we need 5 major parties.

Or perhaps it’s not that complex to begin with and we just need a third party to hold up the middle of the spectrum.

It is interesting that the last two presidents have been working their positions very close to the middle.  The two before that weren’t really all that far from center themselves.  And the current two candidates are (at least publicly) also laying their groundwork closer to the middle.

Those of us that speak from the conservative space tend to find this troublesome.  We tend to find the left and even middle positions to be dramatically distant from where we think the right answers are.  Sometimes, there are points where the Left is out to do the right thing, at least to solve short-term problem, but unable (it seems) to see the bigger picture and align policy to with a long-term view of the impact of government action.

I wonder if there will ever be a way that bipartisan can mean that both parties have a role in completing the whole picture.  Instead of their positions being at odds, could they be complementary?

It ought to at least be that way within a single party, shouldn’t it?

Enjoy the convention this week.  It will be eventful.  It will be charged.  And there are likely to be a few surprises!

Sphere: Related Content

Rick Warren’s Chat With The Candidates

Art Smith August 20th, 2008

I finally got time to watch a recording of Saturday night’s Saddleback Church event with Obama and McCain.  DJ made some excellent observations earlier in the week, which I thought I might supplement a bit.  If you have not seen it yet, I strongly suggest that you view this event as I think it provides the most candid view of these candidates available to date.

I don’t really know Rick Warren that well.  I have read “The Purpose Driven Life”, as have millions of others, and I did find the book helpful in my perspective on and relationship with God.  I appreciate his work on that.

Rick rang a bell I’ve been tolling here from time to time… we need to find ways to engage in productive, civil discourse without all of the useless, antagonizing, confrontational venom that has poured out of so many blogs and talk shows this year.  In my opinion, if you need to resort to name-calling, gutter language, threats or other forms of verbal intimidation, then perhaps even you don’t consider your opinion to have much credibility.

Faith/World View

Obama was probably the best prepared that I’ve ever seen him.  He acted very personable, friendly, and seemed reasonable in his presentation, and worked the conversational approach to his answers which for many could easily hide the fact that he didn’t really have much to say.

Barack, talking about his faith, said a lot of the right things, which I hope he would have been prepared to do, although I found it interesting that he ended that by saying:

“And it means that those sins that I have on a fairly regular basis hopefully will be washed away.”

The words “hope” and “hopefully” are funny words in how they are understood.  “Hope” has a larger variety of meanings, ranging from “a desired result carrying a strong certainty” to “a feeling that something desired can happen”, but lacking certainty.  There are other related definitions tied to people whom we place hope in, etc. In the Christian faith, the word “hope” is often tied directly to “faith”, such as in Hebrews 11:1:

Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.

The word hope in this context lacks any sense of uncertainty, and quite the opposite, is part of a strongly confident statement of faith.  “Hope” in our faith relates closely to a high level of confidence, and directly as a reference to our Lord Jesus.

“Hopefully”, on the other hand, is a word beset with uncertainty.  This word tends to convey, in almost any context, that the desired outcome seems, not unlikely, back lacking strong confidence.

It may seem like I am over-analyzing unplanned word choice here, but if you watch the video, he is almost being flippant about one of the core aspects of the Christian faith: Christ died for our sins and has made them clean and never needing to be paid for again.  To those of us who believe, this is an unshakable truth, and the hope we have in this is an absolute confidence that our sins are washed away.

I don’t want to convey doubts that his faith is real, I’m just pointing out that something that should be, if his faith is real, an absolute in his life, appears to be an area where he lacks confidence.  I would hate to see this kind of confidence while negotiating an arms treaty with Iran.

McCain answered this question succinctly “I’m saved and forgiven”.  Direct and without wavering.  He shared what I think is an already well-known story about a guard in the POW camp where he was held.  The guard apparently provided him some relief while he was being tortured and later communicated why by drawing a cross in the sand.  Again, I’m not in a position to know the place of John McCain’s heart either, but his confidence and sense that the Christian faith is relevant on the world stage is appealing.

Abortion

As many others have already stated elsewhere, Obama sure copped out with the “above my pay grade” statement. Since the question was “at what point is a baby entitled to human rights?”, it seems that someone seeking to be the President of the United States should actually have an answer for this question.

Essentially, Barack made one thing clear: he does not believe that life begins at conception.  But he also attempts to be conciliatory, saying that there are too many abortions.  He also states that he opposes late-term abortions.  But he never actually answers the question.

After this one, I sort of wish he had asked Obama “When would it be okay to use nuclear weapons?”.  I suspect that one is above his pay grade as well.

I was somewhat disappointed that Warren said “I know that this [subject of abortion] is a complex issue”.  It should not be complex for Warren, unless he also does not believe that life begins at conception.  It is hard for many to work it out because they either struggle with the emotional aspects of the issue (especially when considering rape and incest cases) or simply lack any meaningful respect for life at all (which is the plague we have beset upon ourselves in the past century).

At any rate, McCain was again direct, and answered the question: “At the moment of conception”.  He went on to state his pro-life record.

Both candidates came down essentially in support of embryonic stem-cell research, although McCain thinks he has an out by pushing other similar research on skin cells.  It’s unfortunate that we’re not able to confront one of the issues that has made it possible and yet hard to deal with this, and that’s the fact that in vitro fertilization is already killing babies.  This is where Obama is content taking stem-cells from.  But neither candidate, nor much of the media on any side of this discussion, has the stomach to say what needs to be said: in vitro fertilization itself if wrong because it requires the conception of many sets of early forming embryos, and often destroys all but those that are transferred to the mother (although cryogenic storage of excess embryos does occur… I can’t even begin to tell you how much that bothers me).  And current successful pregnatncy rates are about 35% in the US.  If you believe that life begins at conception, you have to face this situation head-on.  I feel for the needs of those who have trouble conceiving.  I feel for those who put their hope (there we go again) in the possibiliy that stem-cell research will lead to cures for horrible diseases.  But taking a life, is just wrong.

Supreme Court Justices

(I know I skipped a bunch of topics, including Marriage.  If it really bugs you, leave me a comment.)

According to Omaba, Clarence Thomas was not intellectually prepared to be on the Supreme Court (”I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time…”).  Somehow, that same kind of thinking permeates my mind when I think about Obama as President.  But I digress…

McCain hit the key on this question of whom he would not have nominated to the Supreme Court.  McCain lists the four that I would have listed (Ginsberg, Breyer, Souter and Stevens).  He hits the targets by stating that the Court should adhere strictly to the Constitution, and should NOT legislate.

Evil

I thought that McCain’s most shining moment was in answer to this question: “Does evil exist, and if it does do we ignore it, do we negotiate with it, do we contain it or do we defeat it?”.

Obama said that it exists, and that it has to be confronted, and then he got kind of wishy-washy by saying that sometimes we do evil when we say we are trying to eliminate evil (sounds like Congress to me).

McCain simply stated: “Defeat it!”.  His intensity as he said that was inspiring, and his follow-up in describing the critical need to capture Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice was impressive and compelling.

Overall

Both men were very personable in this setting, and I think the event gave them both an opportunity to be seen as real people to some degree.

As DJ stated, McCain was much more direct overall, and very much on top of all of the topics.  Some have concluded that perhaps McCain was not has secluded during the Obama portion of the event as Warren had intimated.  That is just ridiculous.  I prefer to think that the two men have different styles, and different degrees of experience to draw upon.  My friend BitHead today published the following information:

Candidate Congress Military
John McCain 26 years 22 years
Barack Obama 143 days 0 days

Now granted, Obama has other areas of experience, but politically and particularly in working across the aisle, he simply lacks the experience to be as well prepared for this interview that McCain has.  The more opportunity to see the two fo them side-by-side, the more convinced I think most people will become that an Obama presidency is extremely risky.

We’ll see… I may come back to some of the other topics another day.

Sphere: Related Content

Another VP Announcement

Art Smith August 19th, 2008

I’m probably not the first or last person to announce this.

In order to ensure full disclosure, reduce the clutter of blogosphere speculation, and give people something more important to focus on, I have decided to release critical information that is guaranteed to put everyone’s mind at rest.

I am officially NOT going to be a candidate for Vice President.

At least, not during the 2008 election.

I have verified that both the Obama and McCain campaigns are still not taking my calls, so my confidence level is very high on this announcement.

Besides, I really like my current job.

There are a lot more qualified candidates.

The vetting process is likely to expose events in my past that I’m not proud of.

I want to devote more time to my family.

I think I can contribute more effectively in my current role.

I would have been honored to be asked (but I wasn’t).

~  ~  ~  ~  ~

I think I’ve managed to scoop EVERYONE on this story!

~  ~  ~  ~  ~

I’m not much for speculating at this point.  I’m sure that in 6 weeks, we’ll all know for sure who the VP candidates will be.  Current thought is that we’ll know within 2 weeks, but I’m hedging.  But really, what is the value of continuing to run in circles on this topic.  Much less effort is required if we just wait for the answer and THEN make a big fuss about it.

Don’t you think?

Sphere: Related Content

McCain, Obama and Rick Warren

DJ Durant August 19th, 2008

We were channel surfing on Saturday night because the Olympic coverage was of the women’s marathon, which I liken to watching paint dry, when we happened upon Rick Warren’s interviews of the respective candidates.  The least I can say is that the contrasts were spectacular.  John McCain was the all-around winner, (unless he was being judged by Olympic judges, in which case he would have placed second due to some unusual tie-breaking formula!).

Senator McCain opened up the proverbial can of Whompem on Senator Obama in these areas:

  • Clarity–McCain’s remarks were straightforward, transparent and to the point.  It’s why he also got to answer more questions.  His answers were focused, and his intent was clear.  Note to Obama–at no point in the next eight years do we, as a nation, want to have another debate over the definition of “is”.
  • Decisiveness–Senator McCain knows where he stands on certain issues and there is no wiggle room.  Never mind the fact that I agree with him on the “major” issues, the nation needs and wants a leader that can make a decision and articulate it to us.  Note to President Bush–articulate and communicate in this sense mean the same thing.  It’s the major weakness of your administration.  Note to Obama–I still don’t know where you stand on anything, because I don’t believe you know where you stand.  It’s one thing to talk about concepts like “hope” and “change”, but as President, we want to know you stand for something bigger than yourself and your ego.  You need to prove it to us.
  • Humor–Obama’s crack about Pastor Warren’s book sales was out of line.  Barack, in your wildest dreams your book would sell 25 million copies.  McCain was able to laugh at himself and people like that.
  • Experience–Track record is becoming more and more important in this campaign.  McCain’s is extensive.  Obama, well, most of his national experience has been spent running for President.  The geo-political situation is shifting.  I want someone who’s been there, done that.  The country can ill afford a President who requires on-the-job training.
  • Taxes–Need I say more?  The notion that Obama thinks $250,000 is a lot of money tells me that he is really out of touch with the majority of people in this country.  A quarter of a million dollars ain’t what it used to be.  It seems that Obama’s economic policy advisor is Karl Marx.

The list goes on and on.  We could talk about their contrasting views of the Supreme Court, their anecdotes about their lives, etc.  I still don’t know who Senator Obama is, and at this point in the campaign, the nation should have a pretty good idea.  Senator McCain, you impressed me Saturday night, and the nation, I feel, as well.

Sphere: Related Content

Next »