Log in    

Archive for the 'Democratic Party' Category

Arnold Is Drinking The Kool-aid

Art Smith August 28th, 2008

Sad to see, but true.  California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is appearing on a web site to promote “EcoDriving“.  Among his comments are that we should do…

Simple things such as maintaining proper tire pressure and avoiding rapid starts and stops, and keeping your engine tuned.

Gag me.  He preceeds the above comments with the standard liberal line that moving forward with implementing “biofuels, offshore drilling and nuclear power” will have no immediate impact on gasoline prices.

I’ve known for a while now that Arnold has tended to lean to the liberal way of thinking.  Now he’s reading the Democratic Party talking points.

And the talking points continue to deliver the biggest lie of all:

Americans aren’t doing what they should be doing to keep fuel consumption down.

When I hear lines like “If every American would just do these things…”, the supposed improvements seem to make the assumption that every American is failing to do these things.  That’s just stupid and disingenuous.

We’re not a country of morons.  Stop treating us like we are.

Drill here.  NOW.

Sphere: Related Content

The Obama Nomination

Art Smith August 27th, 2008

Well, it’s official.  Barack Obama is now the first African American (am I supposed to still say that, or am I supposed to say “black” now?  I can’t get this Political Correctness down right it seems) to be nominated by a major party for President, as long as you don’t include Warren Harding, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, and Calvin Coolidge.

Oh, that list surprised you?  If so, you may want to watch this video:

Regardless of whether the information in the video is true of not, Obama certainly IS the first person to receive the presidential nomination of a major party BECAUSE he is African American.

I am, in one regard, happy to see a person of color nominated.  Witnessing an historic event of this nature is certainly breathtaking.  I will also be happy the day a woman is nominated.  Any perception that walls or ceilings preventing any member of our society from becoming President needs to be crushed.

And getting past these historic milestones will also allow our country, which seems to have lost its aggregate mind, to get its focus back (if it ever was) on electing people for better reasons than: skin-color, gender, ethnicity, religion, age or Kennedy-ness.

Maybe we can move on to electing people because they will represent the interests and opinions of our country effectively.  Or because they will defend our people and the Constitution.  Or because they are interested in seeing the country prosper.

Barack Obama is not the right person to lead our country.  There is no evidence whatsoever that he has ever done anything effective in his political career.  A Coke and a smile are not going to do the hard job of addressing the current ills facing us and creating a strategy for long-term growth in our economy.

John McCain has what is needed to work toward the right policies to cut spending, protect our borders, stimulate our economy, finish the work in Iraq, eliminate our dependence on foreign oil, and keep our liberties safe from the growing solicialist mindset that is infiltrating the Democratic party.

Congratulations, Barack.  Don’t start measuring for drapes just yet.

Sphere: Related Content

Why Party Unity Matters

Art Smith August 24th, 2008

Democrats for decades have been struggling with the inner turmoil of diverse political positions which have kept their party from setting a course that all Democrats can get behind.  And this partly why that party has bled so many conservative Democrats to vote for Republican Presidents.

Obama has succeeded in achieving the role of presumptive Democratic nominee for President by keeping his message as vague as possible, by pandering to specific interest groups as needed, and by establishing who he is not.  But it is not clear what part of the party he really aligns with.

This week will definitely tell the tale of how well he can lead and influence the grassroots Democrats who will be attending the Democratic National Convention.  He’s already mentioned that he’s added content to the party platform (supposedly to limit late-term abortions).  Will convention-goers be receptive to those changes?

And, as Ted Van Dyk asks in a piece this weekend in the Wall Street Journal, will Obama be able to bring “Reagan Democrats” back home?  Interestingly enough, as the nation has become more educated, it has not necessarily swung in either the left or right direction dramatically except for bursts of elections of Presidents (where in the past 40 years we have seen mostly Republican Presidents).

The fact is, there is a large pool of voters, some of whom call themselves Independents, some of whom call themselves Republicans and tend to have liberal thinking about some social issues, and some of whom call themselves Democrats and have a series of issues (I think both social and fiscal) where they are conservative.  Probably the biggest issue for many of these people is that they don’t feel either party is really speaking to them.

And that’s alright.

Except of course for the fact that the Democratic Party has struggled so badly over the last 40 years with dramatic infighting which will likely continue through this week, and in most elections cycles has kept them from hitting a home run on the Presidential level.  Obviously, Carter and Clinton are the exceptions.  But it appears that, as Van Dyk tells us, that many Democrats perceive a party significantly divided:

Since 1968, independent and on-the-fence voters have come to perceive that there are, in fact, two Democratic Parties represented by two kinds of candidates. There is the middle-income, middle-minded, socially more conservative, bread-and-butter Democratic Party. Then, there is the better-educated, higher-income, socially liberal Democratic Party. The candidates of these wings do not have their feet wholly in one camp or another. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton campaigned successfully as undefined populists, and benefited from weak Republican opposition. But as a rule, Democratic presidential candidates have not since 1968 been able to restore the party that was broken that year. Lyndon Johnson, in 1964, was the last Democratic presidential candidate to gain a national majority of white voters.

As much as I’m afraid to say this, what I’m seeing this year, while in fact many (including myself) would emphatically state that race or sex are not obstacles to voting for a candidate, this year’s election will be cast as a year of racial divide in America as Barack Obama is almost certain to continue the tradition of not getting the majority of white votes.  And it will be perceived as an even greater American friction if he wins in that case.  And a friction that may even exist within his own party.  How well he brings Democrats together this week may spell either the success of demise of his campaign.

For either party, it would be well to jettison the truly extreme factions in order to ensure the solid base knows it can expect the kind of conservative or liberal core values that each of these two parties has stood for over the decades.  We are already moving deeply into a divide between major philosophies of governing, and it is imperative that we have ample opportunity to engage in meaningful discourse.  I’m afraid that four or five major views will become confusing for most (including me) and we will not succeed within the context of two major parties.  If we have 5 major positions on most social and fiscal issues, perhaps we need 5 major parties.

Or perhaps it’s not that complex to begin with and we just need a third party to hold up the middle of the spectrum.

It is interesting that the last two presidents have been working their positions very close to the middle.  The two before that weren’t really all that far from center themselves.  And the current two candidates are (at least publicly) also laying their groundwork closer to the middle.

Those of us that speak from the conservative space tend to find this troublesome.  We tend to find the left and even middle positions to be dramatically distant from where we think the right answers are.  Sometimes, there are points where the Left is out to do the right thing, at least to solve short-term problem, but unable (it seems) to see the bigger picture and align policy to with a long-term view of the impact of government action.

I wonder if there will ever be a way that bipartisan can mean that both parties have a role in completing the whole picture.  Instead of their positions being at odds, could they be complementary?

It ought to at least be that way within a single party, shouldn’t it?

Enjoy the convention this week.  It will be eventful.  It will be charged.  And there are likely to be a few surprises!

Sphere: Related Content

Doing My Part

Art Smith August 15th, 2008

Last week I started taking my bicycle to work. It’s about 7.5 miles as the crow flies, and my shortest (and most difficult) route is about 8.5 miles… the longest (and easiest) route is 13 miles.  Downtown Des Moines is at a slightly lower elevation than the suburb of West Des Moines where I live, so mornings aren’t too bad, just a one tough hill, and afternoons, when taking the longer route, is okay except for one really big hill.

I realize that this is not a big deal… the point is NOT that I’m doing anything that great.

But I am saving about a gallon of gasoline each day I do this. That’s about $3.50 a day.  At least that covers my coffee money.

And if you know anything about my weight and health, you’ll recognize that 2 or 3 days a week of this is going to have a very positive impact on those areas.

Frankly, the majority of my motivation is health related, but the pont I really want to make is, I’m doing my part to help reduce our dependence on foriegn oil, now when is Nancy Pelosi going to do hers???

When is Leonard Boswell (my US House Representative) going to do his part???

When is Tom Harkin, the Democratic Senator from Iowa going to do his part???

My other Senator, Chuck Grassley, has been supporting the move to drill.  As are more Republicans.  And I know there are Democrats that want to but are too fearful of party reprisal to stand up and act.

We pay these folks far too much money to let them thumb their noses and ignore the will of the people, the need of the people, the need of our country to depart from the putrid dependence on foreign oil.  Now is the time to act!  Congress must act NOW or get the majority party voted out for holding us, the people they work for, hostage!

I hope that Obama doesn’t get the idea to push bike riding as the big solution.  I can see it now: “You know, if every American would ride their bicycle to work every day, we’d reduce our consumption of gasoline by ten billion gallons a year… “.  Of course, the math would be wrong, just like the tire inflation savings was itself inflated by bad math.

I’m pretty sure that everyone in Alaska cares so much about ANWR that they all bike to work anyway.

* * *

So today ends two full weeks of the GOP Protest against Democrats laziness.  Not only are Republican leaders NOT slowing down, there is more and more media attention turning to this historic event.  This link to John Boehner’s web site includes links to various media web sites, including (at the top!) our very own Des Moines Register.

I’ve heard about some people that have contacted their representatives multiple times since this began.  That’s a good idea!  I’m going to check in with mine again as well!

And lastly, the price of oil went up and down a bit this week, but still ended the week down 1%.  We keep this up, we won’t need to worry about our tire inflations any more, will we?

Sphere: Related Content

Oil Prices Went… You Guessed It…

Art Smith August 11th, 2008

Down!  Not alot, but it dropped another $.75 today to $114.45 a barrel.

Meanwhile, the Republican Protest against the Democratic No-Vote Vacation continued into its second full week, with activity at Capital Hill and at town halls throughout the country.  House Republicans want everyone (that means you and me) to contact their Democratic representatives and tell them to demand a vote on the American Energy Act (H.R. 6566) immediately.

Politico reports that Democrats are now demanding that House Minority Leader John Boehner apologize for remarks he made on Friday about Nancy Pelosi… regarding the public’s “hanging” her if she does not address the energy topic.

Boehner’s staff later replied with this message:

“Leader Boehner used a figure of speech to reflect the frustration Americans feel every time they fill up at the pump,” said a Boehner aide. “A solid majority of Americans favor more production of American energy to help reduce fuel costs, and Speaker Pelosi, Senator Reid, and Senator Obama have blatantly defied their will by leaving town for five weeks without allowing a vote on an ‘all of the above’ energy plan to lower gas prices.”

It’s unbelievable to me that Pelosi and company can continue to ignore the American public.  It shows you the kind of warped perspective that people can develop when they go to Washington.  America, take ownership of your Congress!  Call your representative today!  Call (202)224-2121 and ask to be connected to your congressman/woman.

Sphere: Related Content

What A Week: Party Unity

Art Smith August 9th, 2008

On the Republican side, the increase in McCain’s position in the polls, slow as it is in coming, is a reflection of the unity that is starting to build within the Republican Party.  I think what you’re really seeing is that as the various state conventions come to a close, and people have finished jockeying for position to attend the Republican National Convention, that the dust is settling, people are getting into position for victory and are finally realizing the inevitable: John McCain is going to be the Republican Candidate… there’s little that could change that now.  People are seeing more and more clearly the need to get past the differences and work toward victory in November, both in the Oval Office and in Congress.  The more that people get to know Obama, the less they like him.  If they pay attention.  As we all pay more attention to facts, to action, to words, and less on form, appeal, music, timing we see more of the truth.  Feelings cloud the truth… watch out for emotional invitations with no substance.

And, the past few weeks of drama in Congress probably haven’t hurt much either.

On the Democratic side, we have a party that is apparently intent on losing in November.  And I have no problem with that.

First of all, the Democratically controlled Congress has made what will probably a massive blunder by thumbing their collective noses at the American People.  Going on vacation in August without a vote on Energy Policy is causing most of the country to retaliate with support of the Republican Protest in Washington.  Iowans in particular are unhappy because this recess occurred without satisfactory action Flood Relief.  It’s unconscionable for Pelosi and Reid to ignore the real present needs of the country, even though they got their own personal agendas adressed (the housing bill).

Then secondly the continuing saga of Hillary’s desire to be President.  This week she stated that she would still seek to have her name put in nomination at the Democratic National Convention in order to appease those who had supported her and build party unity.  I don’t know what’s wrong with Clinton.  It’s a perfect storm for the Republicans: “See how self-serving Democrats are?”, “Democrats are STILL fighting over their candidate!”.  And I can just see it now… “I had no idea I would end up as the Candidate!”

In Iowa, it was somewhat revealing that the Democratic State Convention lasted well into the early hours of the next day due to the perilous extent of differences and in-fighting, while Republicans, who had their differences on the table, completed business before the afternoon expired.

The bottom line is, Democrats do NOT have it together as a party.  Republicans are not perfect either, but evidently recognize the importance of unity in achieving success.

At least this year.

Hat Tips to: John Deeth, ABC Online, and Don Frederick at the LA Times Blog.

Sphere: Related Content

What A Week: Marriage

Art Smith August 9th, 2008

Two big hits on prominant families this week.

Mr. Shawshank

One is Morgan Freeman.  You may recall he was in an automobile accident earlier this week and was in serious condition.  He was released later in the week after surgery with shoulder damage and a broken arm and elbow.  According to Fox News, Freeman and his wife Myrna Colley-Lee have been separated since last December.

As far as I know, this was a huge surpise to most of the world.  Of course, being in an accident with a lady friend in the car can lead to speculation, but I don’t anyone was ready to start accusing Freeman of infidelity.  It seems she was a friend that had simply offered him a ride home.

I’m guessing the biggest reason for the divorce disclosure now is the fact someone might be asking why his wife isn’t taking care of him.

Mr. Perfect

John Edwards admitted this week that he had been in an adulterous relationship with Rielle Hunter in 2006.  The tone of his apology to the general public (since he has already apologized to his wife some time ago) was politically wordsmithed to convey a sense that the issue of adultery was trivial and that his primary sin (though he never uses that word, rather he uses the word “choice”) was not having an affair, it was in not revealing it to the public earlier… denying it in fact because he thought the inaccuracies in the report by the National Enquirer made it deniable.

It will be interesting to see whether Edwards can recover from this politically.  Obviously, he has recovered from the family impacts since his wife has publicaly forgiven him.  Ed Morrissey at Hot Air provides an excellent analysis of where Edwards can go from here.

This item from Death By A Thousand Paperclips in December of last year is interesting to view in light of this week’s revelation.

My thoughts on Captain Ed’s commentary: What is revealing about Edwards is an almost blatant disregard for integrity and trust.  The reason most politicians conceal improprieties of this nature is that the public simply doesn’t like to elect people that would do something as bad as cheating on their wife.  On the positive side, the public is becoming generally less concerned about marital infidelity on its face because we understand that all of us have failings.

On the negative side, the public is becoming more and more tolerant of those failing in solemn commitments and tolerating, or just looking blindly at, people who have given a vow to another and have broken it, many of them repeatedly.  The public does this without considering what that means to the public trust.  The same thing happened with Bill Clinton, and even today many just giggle about the licentious behavior of Jack and Ted Kennedy and continue to diefy both of them despite evidence to the contrary.  in 8 years, I’d bet Gary Hart, Jonathan Edwards, maybe even Hugh Hefner could all become President.

The mark of confusion comes in this regard: skills and character are two different things.  Skills are things you learn how to do, and can do effectively outside the realm of integrity.  Skills can be easily measured and agreed upon.  Character is is about how you use your skills, what choices you will make, how far people can trust you to do the right thing.

One can be taught how execute on the right thing.  A lifetime is spent becoming the person who knows what the right thing is and when to do it.

Hat Tips to Real Clear Politics, Death By A Thousand Paperclips, Hot Air, and Daily Kos.

Update: Mispelling.

Sphere: Related Content

Pay Attention

Art Smith July 27th, 2008

Watch this video a moment:

Now, the video is about watching out for bicyclists while you are driving, but there’s a good correlary.  This video demonstrates how easy it is to let someone distract you.  It’s the typical slight of hand trick, make you focus on one thing and make it look like something else is either not happening or happening magically… like a shell-game.  Congress is good at this.  Case in point, the housing bill passed yesterday.  Everyone is focused on the big items in the bill, but so many little things are happening in there that no one is paying attention to.  No one seems to be making a fuss about the recapture on the $7,500 tax credit.

If Congress (or any politician) or the MSM says “Look at this!”, beware, there’s something else going on.

Sphere: Related Content

Deciding How To Vote in November

Art Smith June 27th, 2008

I was subjected to scenes of Barack and Hillary playing nice with each other on stage at a rally in Unity, New Hampshire.  It was a bit over the top.

I don’t know what the real content (if any) of their speeches consisted of, and the newscasts simply showed snippets of each of them saying cute and insipidly stupid things about each other (Obama: “She Rocks!  She Rocks!  That’s what I’m talking about”).

At the same time, CBS covered Clinton supporters at the rally who are dead set against voting for Obama, and writing in Clinton.  Like that’s gonna work.

It’s intriguing that so many people are proclaiming they will not vote for one of the major candidates this fall.  I’ve be watching some bloggers and talk show hosts who are taking the idealistic path of saying “No way will I ever vote for McCain!”.  I can totally understand the need to think through and work out one’s priorities and convictions.  And of course, this kind of thoughtful discourse is a tad better than those who want to vote for Obama because they like his looks or mannerisms.  But the more I hear people say they are rejecting McCain because he doesn’t represent their perfect set of values, the more I wonder whether these people a) understand politics (especially our brand of two-party politics), and b) know of someone other than themselves that would fit the bill.

Granted, if there was a real chance that Fred Thompson could run on the third party ticket and win the election (and I mean a real chance), I’d get in line for that.  But the fact is that, especially with the incredible splintering we are experiencing in each party right now, there is practically zero chance that a third party candidate would win… there would be too many and such candidates would simply take votes out of the pool of votes that would normally go to one of the core parties.

The biggest confusion I think many suffer from is the belief that the Presidency really matters so much in terms of having the perfect person (with regard to policy) that someone like McCain would actually represent a negative impact on our country’s success.  Someone like McCain is not going to create dramatic domestic change on his own.  He is unlikely to create chaos, or dramatically oppose Congress in areas such as the Economy, Energy, Health Care.  His presence may influence to some degree a Democratically controlled Congress in a way that would be slightly more favorable to Conservatives, though without being a dramatic voice for Conservatives.

McCain’s presence in the White House will, however, certainly provide strong support for a more conservative Congress, whether created in this cycle or in two years.  Regardless of his statements regarding domestic drilling, for instance, it is extremely unlikely that he would veto a domestic drilling bill, especially if the People make it clear that they want it.

An Obama administration would be devastating.  A Democratic Congress would be empowered to move for more and more sweeping change, including socialized Medicine, higher taxes, growing restraints on freedom, including new reviews of gun control once some Supreme Court appointments are made.  It’s interesting that even when we’ve been in a position to have the court review Roe v Wade, the court has avoided bringing any cases up on abortion rights.  But once the court is solidly activist and liberal, watch out… hide your guns, your faith and your thoughts.

Obama and a Republican Congress would be somewhat more controlled.  And yet, Supreme Court appointments and foreign relations are still big risk areas.  And dismantling our defense infrastructure, especially our nuclear arsenal, and jumping ship on our allies (backing out of Iraq, of example) appear to be the centerpieces of Obama’s campaign.  We might as well all start learning Farsi and Russian now to stay ahead of the game.

Bottom line is, everyone needs to vote their conscience.  But one’s conscience should go beyond your personal values compared to the candidates, and rather, look at our personal values compared to the events and circumstances that may occur as a result of our voting.  Obviously, we can’t predict everything, but I’m not going to avoid voting for a candidate that’s been divorced simply because I think divorce is bad.  Now, if the candidate promotes a vision of an America where murder is acceptable, where shipping the lowest 10% of income earners to Australia is the model for increasing America’s wealth, where legalizing unmonitored sales of cocaine is the ideal solution for solving our drug problems, that candidate will be vehemently opposed by me.  As a Christian, I hear many who share my faith placing expectations on the candidate to share the convictions of their faith.  While we (as followers of Christ) have a responsibility to speak out the truth, placing this kind of expectation on our leaders is not only impractical, it is inconsistent with our celebration of the Founders, many of whom were Deists… I would still vote for George Washington, even if he doesn’t believe God is actively involved in the affairs of the world.

We must continue to have effective dialog on issues, candidates, etc.  Throughout this campaign period, we continue to have opportunities to influence the debate and sway party officials, candidates, and voters… we should not abandon that opportunity (and for some us, a responsibility).

The support here at The Conservative Reader will, barring some major issue, be for the Republican candidate for President.  More importantly, we want to ensure there is appropriate focus and dialog on Congressional seats, both House and Senate, because the core of where our country is going will be reflected in those chambers more powerfully than in the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  Building a grassroots groundswell to take back the legislative arm of government should be Priority 1.

That said, this is a place for discussion.  Voice your opinion here.  We want to learn from each other.  Everything described here is worthless if we don’t engage with each other and our representatives.  Not engaging is what leads to the the wanton abuses we’ve seen in both parties, and if we allow them to continue, shame on us.

Sphere: Related Content

It’s Another Day Of Confusion

Art Smith June 3rd, 2008

Of course, on the last day of Presidential Primary Season, things are so close between Obama and Clinton that different new organizations have differing opinions about whether Obama has clinched the nomination or not.  And on top of that, the AP reported this morning tha Clinton will concede tonight, and of course her campaign denies that today (they would have denied it whether true of false).

I think it’s safe to say Obama will be the nominee at this point.

Also, Hillary apparently told New York lawmakers that she would consider running as Vice-President with Obama.  That will be interesting.

Hat tip to KCCI-TV and WSJ.

Sphere: Related Content

Next »

View blog authority View blog reactions BlogBurst.com