Log in    

Archive for the 'Economy' Category

McCain’s Acceptance Speech

Art Smith September 5th, 2008

A lot of you have seen the speech, some have not.  Overall, high marks for contents.  Very high.  I think he brought out the right issues, positions, and comparisons with Obama.  He’s working out the differences, which he needs to continue to do.  Probably the three key areas that he addressed and should continue to address:

  1. Key distinctions between Democrats and Republicans on social and economic issues.
  2. Demonstrable track record in leading and doing the right thing both in policy and ethical behavior.
  3. Bipartisan attitude and effort in pooling ideas and working with all sides to find the best solutions.

Clearly, the convention floor was energized.  I would say (as others have also said) that the presentation was not as strong as the content.  I’d have to give John a B- for presentation.  However, the apex of the speech, the culmination of his message of “fighting”, was well executed and effective.  The key to that was pushing through the speech at that point without stopping despite the applause, cheers, and revelry.

So, some thoughts on key pieces of the speech.

On Sarah Palin:

“I’ve found the right partner to shake up Washington, DC.”

I don’t recall ever seeing so much of a speech by a Presidential nominee devoted to the Vice-Presidential nominee.  Very cool.  Sending the right message right up front that Sarah has John’s 100% support, that they are a team with  common mission, and that the mission is one that Americans have been begging for now for decades.  Clean up the Swamp… obviously, Pelosi is unable to.

“I don’t work for a Party, I don’t work for a special interest, I don’t work for myself.  I work for you.”

This will be one of the key messages of the campaign, from what I can tell.  I’m not 100% behind a message of the President acting as a “representative” of the will of the people.  Sometimes, the President is going to have to do some unpopular things and be okay with the consequences, just as Bush has done.  Regardless, the intended and probably heard message here is that John considers himself beholden to no other men of power than those than elect him, and that is refreshing, contraintuitive (for most politicians), and effective.

“We lost the trust of the American People… we’re going to change that.”

Honesty about the major errors made by members of his own party.  This is probably where “cleaning up Washington” is going to be the most effective message, in declaring that ethical failings have been bipartisan, and that the cleanup will be as well.  This may not make some Republican leaders very happy, and hopefully the American people will get the fact that this is a big risk for McCain.

“Education is the Civil Rights issue of this century.  … Empower parents with choice [in education options].”

One of the distinctions of Republians vs. Democrats: Republicans want options for families and accountability for the educators.  My favorite line:

“… Help bad teachers find another line of work.”

He also stated that he wants to help good educators to be as effective as possible, removing barriers and compensatnig them appropriately.

“I will reach out my hand to anyone to help me get this country moving again.”

If McCain is elected, he may become known as the most bipartisan and effective president in decades.  This will undoubtedly be more difficult than the work he’s done on the House and Senate floors, but he’s willing.

“Get back up and fight again for my country and for the men I had the honor to serve with because every day they fought for me.”

This was a quote from his comrad in the POW camp after John had been broken.  This should become a metafor to challenge America to fight on, and why.  At the end of the speech, John makes that so.

“Nothing brings greater happiness in life than to serve a cause greater than yourself.”

Both candidates are probably going to repeat this kind of rhetoric (I suspect McCain is more likely to speak truthfully of this, but that’s just my opinion) because they know that many in our nation resonate with this statement.  However, I doubt that enough people really do sometimes.  The fact is, so many Americans are focused on themselves and their personal challenges (and granted, many of them are in real need, so that is understandable).  We have had a couple of generations move into voting age these past couple of decades, where the priorities are very “me” centered.  There are some, but few, who truly think of others before themselves.  This is one of the core areas of decay in our society.  If McCain, Obama, or both of them can influence and self-centered electorate to look outside themselves as they consider what is best for America, this will be a profoundly positive and successful election regardless of who wins.

“I’m going to fight for my cause every day as your president. I’m going to fight to make sure every American has every reason to thank God, as I thank him: that I’m an American, a proud citizen of the greatest country on Earth, and with hard work, strong faith and a little courage, great things are always within our reach. Fight with me. Fight with me.

“Fight for what’s right for our country!

“Fight for the ideals and character of a free people!

“Fight for our children’s future!

“Fight for justice and opportunity for all!

“Stand up to defend our country from its enemies!

“Stand up for each other; for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America!

“Stand up, stand up, stand up and fight! Nothing is inevitable here! We’re Americans, and we never give up! We never quit! We never hide from history! We make history!”

This was the high-point of the speech.  The crowd was going nuts through the whole paragraph, and John never faltered… he pushed right through and allowed the crowd to keep building and building to a crescendo that climaxed in my heart, and hopefully many many others as well.

If ever our country and the Republican Party needed this kind of encouragement it is now.  As a country, we have struggled through 18 months or more of growing challenges that have impacted the worlds of so many people with the loss of homes, jobs, financial stability.  Despite the continued success of the action in Iraq (or perhaps because of it), we have not been allowed as a country to stir to a real sense of the victory we are experiencing there.  We don’t understand why so many people around the world hate us.  And we are hurting more and more as our differences in political philosophy create a greater divide than I have ever seen.

As a Party, we are somewhat demoralized because of the losses in 2006.  We are frustrated because the answers to our economic and energy problems seem so clear and yet refuted unendingly in the village square, in the press, in the ears of our representatives in Congress.  We are angry because even when we’ve had control of Congress and the White House, we failed to get our agenda through.  We don’t think we have a chance of winning the US Congress or many of our state legislatures this year.  And we’re still not confident of our prospects of keeping the White House.

And as a result, many, many, many people seem like they are ready to give up.  It’s frustrating to watch.

John says: “Fight!”.  And I agree.

When things appear to be at their worst, we must fight.  We must for the sake of our country, for our children, for future generations.  Else we dishonor the generations past who fought for us.

The rally cry of this campaign needs to be “Fight!”.

Bithead has a great review of the choice now before us.

There is a great deal more that John said in his speech.  You can read the transcript here.

Sphere: Related Content

McCain’s Big Night

Art Smith September 4th, 2008

Just a few minutes away from John McCain’s big speech.

It will be interesting to see how it compares to Palin’s.

David Gergen at CNN is apparently a little bit disconnected as HE stated that others were disconnected who said that Democrats were running Washington.  Gergen’s perspective is apparently that the party of the President dictates who runs Washington, as he says that “Republicans have been running Washington for the last 8 years.”  That doesn’t work for me.

Democrats have held Congress for the last 2 years.  Gergen’s comments were very misleading.

Of course, if you don’t acknowledge the power of Congress today as held by liberal Democrats, you get to ignore the fact that the severe demise of our economy has occurred while Democrats controlled Congress.

The MSM will have us believe what they want us to believe to get more and more liberal control of the government.

Journalism’s demise has been a longstanding disappointment for me.  I had majored in Journalism briefly in college, and I produced a daily 30 minute radio news program at my college for a semester.  I dropped the Journalism major after taking a class in “Journalistic Ethics”.  Seriously, the class was a disappointment as I discovered that, at least in the school setting, the title was an oxymoron.

Anyhow, there’s little hope of seeing the Press act objectively and outside the news.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Tonight’s speech is going to be important not only because of the drive for the McCain-Palin ticket, but for the need to have Republicans take back control of Congress and get us out of this misery.

It’s going to take some work.  McCain needs to do what he can to help as well.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Palin’s speech last night really knocked the socks off of a lot of people… watched by over 37 million people.  Everyone I talked to who saw the speech was really impressed.

Sarah is scaring the Left, including Obama who took the time to make some public comments about Palin today in an attempt to distract from the Republican Convention events.  Listening to his comments, it sounds like he’s confused and unsure how to articulate serious thoughts.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I will not have time to comment tonight on McCain’s speech.   I need to get some sleep.  Tomorrow sometime I’ll comment.

By the way, Cindy McCain is speaking… pretty darn good.  She’ll make a great First Lady.  Great family story.

Sphere: Related Content

Drill, Baby, Drill!

Art Smith September 3rd, 2008

During Rudy Giuliani’s speech at the Republican National Convention tonight, the crowd got so stirred up on the oil drilling issue, they interrupted his speech for a couple of minutes while they chanted (I believe):

“Drill, Baby, Drill!”

It was another inspiring moment produced spontaneously by a group who clearly believe we should use and manage the resources that we own to take care of our country, instead of allowing other foreign interests squeeze us and manipulate us as they control the flow of energy that we need.

Drill, Baby, Drill!!!

Sphere: Related Content

Price Of Oil Not So Crude

Art Smith September 2nd, 2008

After dropping $10/bbl during the day, the price of crude settled down $5 after fears of interruptions in production from Gustav failed to materialize

It really stinks when people are disappointed that nothing bad happens.

That said, it appears we’ve dodged the bullet on the hurricane, although we cannot forget the loss of life and property that has occured.

But it is great news that oil production continues untwarted by the weather, and that the price of oil can continue falling.

When the price as down to about $105 (we closed around $110), at that point the price had lost all it had gained since the beginning of the year.

All that without actually pumping any of that oil out of ANWR or any new off-shore drilling.  All that just from the emotions and reactions to decisions and events and pressure from Americans growing stronger and stronger.

Don’t stop.  Keep fussing.  Contact your congresspeople.  Make a difference!

Drill here.  Drill now.  Pay less.

Sphere: Related Content

More Thoughts On Palin

Art Smith August 30th, 2008

The Left is going absolutely bonkers over the selection of Sarah Palin to run for Vice-President on the GOP ticket.

There’s also a lot of negative comments coming from the Right, although not quite as emotionally charged as those from the Left.

Christopher Patton of The Podium, aka DI Blog (that is, Daily Iowan, I believe) had a great sample headline which read “Sarah Palin is a Far-Right Ideologue“.   Right off I love the headline because it tells me we’ve got the right message coming out.   Patton is great reading if you’re looking for some reasoned content from the Left.  He manages to hit great points, which to someone from the Left sounds like heresy, and to someone on the Right sounds like Heaven.  Example:

Rather than yammering on about whether Sarah Palin was a “smart choice” for John McCain’s running mate, the media should be focusing on whether she has a history of making smart choices. She doesn’t.

For one thing, Palin denies that greenhouse gas emissions from human industrial activity are causing climate change.

Go Sarah!!! We are definitely on the right track!!!

Patton goes on to complain about her support of teaching Creationism in public schools along side of Evolution.  I still remember (back in the early 70’s) when the fight was to allow Evolution to be taught along side Creationism.

Patton doesn’t bother with hitting her Pro-life position, which is probably tearing up many moderates who were hoping for a Pro-choice pick by McCain.

Don’t forget, Sarah wants to drill in ANWR. Bad for the Left, good for the Right.

And he also mentions that she has no foreign policy positions.  I doubt that’s actually true, although she may lack foreign policy experience, but I’m sure we’ll see more of her positions on everything over the next few months.

But I must take the time to contradict the initial point made by Christopher: he says she doesn’t have a history of making smart choices.  I would say she’s made a number of great choices, but significant is this one: confronting the scourge of corruption in her own party.  That is gutsy and will sell well with Americans.  Perhaps not so much with the GOP leadership, which suffers with the same integrity issues at all levels of the party and elected officials as does the Democratic Party.

McCain has always been known as a man of integrity.  He has never taken an earmark while in Congress.  He has fought for stronger rules to protect Congressmen/women from undue influence, and he was one of the minority (which included Clinton and Obama) in the Senate that voted in favor of suspending earmarks earlier this year.

Palin supplements this core value system of staying away from corruption and has succeeded in thwarting part of this offense from Alaska politics.  Cleaning up our Government can become a core mission of this campaign.  My wife said today that Obama wants an undefined change that no one can grasp.  McCain/Palin want change that dramatically improves our confidence in the government, perhaps allowing us to see a day where might be able to trust our politicians more.  Change that drives Congress to make choices that really solve the problems that Americans face.  Change that motivates departments throughout government to cut graft, wasted expense, and focus on meeting their own missions as efficiently as possible. Change that brings us smaller government.

Change that allows us to work and thrive without having to depend on the Government for handouts and tax breaks.

That’s the kind of change America needs.  That’s the kind of change that I know John and Sarah are going to work to provide us.

And that’s looks smart to me.

More info about Sarah Palin in the MSNBC video below.

Sphere: Related Content

Arnold Is Drinking The Kool-aid

Art Smith August 28th, 2008

Sad to see, but true.  California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is appearing on a web site to promote “EcoDriving“.  Among his comments are that we should do…

Simple things such as maintaining proper tire pressure and avoiding rapid starts and stops, and keeping your engine tuned.

Gag me.  He preceeds the above comments with the standard liberal line that moving forward with implementing “biofuels, offshore drilling and nuclear power” will have no immediate impact on gasoline prices.

I’ve known for a while now that Arnold has tended to lean to the liberal way of thinking.  Now he’s reading the Democratic Party talking points.

And the talking points continue to deliver the biggest lie of all:

Americans aren’t doing what they should be doing to keep fuel consumption down.

When I hear lines like “If every American would just do these things…”, the supposed improvements seem to make the assumption that every American is failing to do these things.  That’s just stupid and disingenuous.

We’re not a country of morons.  Stop treating us like we are.

Drill here.  NOW.

Sphere: Related Content

The Obama Nomination

Art Smith August 27th, 2008

Well, it’s official.  Barack Obama is now the first African American (am I supposed to still say that, or am I supposed to say “black” now?  I can’t get this Political Correctness down right it seems) to be nominated by a major party for President, as long as you don’t include Warren Harding, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, and Calvin Coolidge.

Oh, that list surprised you?  If so, you may want to watch this video:

Regardless of whether the information in the video is true of not, Obama certainly IS the first person to receive the presidential nomination of a major party BECAUSE he is African American.

I am, in one regard, happy to see a person of color nominated.  Witnessing an historic event of this nature is certainly breathtaking.  I will also be happy the day a woman is nominated.  Any perception that walls or ceilings preventing any member of our society from becoming President needs to be crushed.

And getting past these historic milestones will also allow our country, which seems to have lost its aggregate mind, to get its focus back (if it ever was) on electing people for better reasons than: skin-color, gender, ethnicity, religion, age or Kennedy-ness.

Maybe we can move on to electing people because they will represent the interests and opinions of our country effectively.  Or because they will defend our people and the Constitution.  Or because they are interested in seeing the country prosper.

Barack Obama is not the right person to lead our country.  There is no evidence whatsoever that he has ever done anything effective in his political career.  A Coke and a smile are not going to do the hard job of addressing the current ills facing us and creating a strategy for long-term growth in our economy.

John McCain has what is needed to work toward the right policies to cut spending, protect our borders, stimulate our economy, finish the work in Iraq, eliminate our dependence on foreign oil, and keep our liberties safe from the growing solicialist mindset that is infiltrating the Democratic party.

Congratulations, Barack.  Don’t start measuring for drapes just yet.

Sphere: Related Content

We’re Losing Momentum On Oil Prices

Art Smith August 25th, 2008

The price of crude is hovering around $115 / bbl.  At this point, I suspect it won’t make much motion, especially not downward, until some real action is finally taken by Congress to open up drilling.  I agree with the refrain of Republicans to do “all of the above”, that is, work the alternative energy agenda while opening update domestic drilling.  The market will continue to laugh at us on the alternative energy options (by the way, we’ve had Ethanol in the US since World War I, so let’s stop acting like alternative fuels are “new”).  But as we engage with definitive action, we will continue to see the impact on commodity prices.

The sad thing is that the market is so clearly expressing it’s ability to react to political events even when there is no tangible change in availability of domestic oil.  Yet the politicians on the Left continue to act like there’s no relationship.  Like the salesmen in the story “The Emporer’s New Clothes”, Democrats believe that as long as they continue to repeat the lies, Americans will believe them.

It’s not working.

Americans are becoming progressively impatient with Congress.  As I’ve been interacting with people in my community and at work, I’m finding more and more just take the foolishness of Congress for granted, and that the truth is in front of everyone’s noses.  I’ve never seen so much exasperation.  Simple message: nobody’s really being fooled by this.

In response to an email I sent to Tom Harkin, there is evidence that Dems really believe that if they ignore the truth and repeat their mantras that everything will work out.  Harkin’s classic response to any input I try to share with him is to basically ignore my comments and then tell me what he’s going to do, why, an essentially feed me the same garbage the Democrats are trying to feed everyone about the availability of  resources in the US to support our country’s needs over time.  Granted, I don’t expect him to just do my bidding, and his response this time is not as bad as some of the prior attempts at treating me like a school boy that needs educating.  But his response is patently lacking credibility, including feeding me insipid suggestions like “inflating tires”.

And I can’t believe he’s getting a bunch of emails from other constituents saying “Please continue doing what you’re doing.  I like paying high prices for oil and can’t wait until we force all Americans to stop using gas powered cars and switch to electric or natural gas powered vehicles.”  And when a Congressman is not listening to his constituents, but rather attempting to change the minds of all of the constituents, that can spell disaster.

We can only hope.

My email to Harkin, Boswell, and Grassley (admittedly, I’m impressed that Harkin replied… I’ve heard nothing from the other two) was this:

Our dependence on foreign powers for sources of key raw materials, especially to provide fuel, is becoming untenable.  I completely understand the concerns of those that want to protect valuable natural habitats and areas of clean untarnished beauty throughout our country.  However, relying on foreign concerns who are intent upon taking advantage of our need for energy resources is simply not working, and in many ways, is starting to make the US seem unintelligent in its dealings and inability to manage its dependence on foreign markets by closing its own internal access to the same resources.  I am anxious to see us build and leverage cleaner solutions for energy, and support any efforts to improve these technologies.  However, we do, and will continue to for a long time, need access to oil, and we need to keep the money spent on this oil within our own economy instead of pouring it out on the rest of the world and diluting its value.

Please support efforts to open up domestic drilling, including off-shore and ANWR.  Please become a leader in a bipartisan effort to make access to domestic oil resources a reality as soon as possible.

Thank you for taking the time to read this, and thank you for your fine work!

Sincerely,

Art Smith

Here is Harkin’s reply:

Dear Arthur:

At a time when Americans are working harder to make ends meet, I share your concern about the high cost of gasoline. Iowans are paying record prices and it’s creating a ripple effect throughout our economy and the problem only seems to be getting worse. These prices make living our daily lives a real challenge. I am fully committed to changing the course of America’s energy policy - to transition America away from our crippling dependence on foreign sources of oil.

These debilitating prices are due in part to a sharp increase in demand over the last few years in places like China and India, an ever weakening dollar, and supply disruptions in volatile places like Nigeria and Iraq - these price pressures are forecast to get worse in the foreseeable future. It is clear that we must chart a new energy course for America - one that aggressively invests in new technologies and pursues energy efficiency that will derive more value from all of our energy resources. And, we must turn to renewable energy sources, a common-sense solution that will help wean us off of foreign oil, stimulate the rural economy, and improve environmental quality. This is a long-term commitment that requires participation at the indi lJidual f corporate, ,and gcverr1rne~~ltal levels ..

In recent weeks, there have been renewed calls to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to drilling and to add more areas to the lands already available for drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) as a solution to high gas prices. But not only will this fail to decrease the cost of gas in the short-term, it does not address our very serious long-term energy needs. For that reason, I will continue to focus my efforts in Washington on a new national energy strategy. As you indicate in your letter, fossil fuels are absolutely an essential component of this energy infrastructure. I have supported and will continue to support appropriate steps to build our supply. I have repeatedly called for construction of the Alaska natural gas pipeline, and I voted for the energy bills in 2005 and 2007, which contained numerous incentives and provisions for the development of fossil fuels. But again, opening up ANWR and new areas of the OCS to drilling will simply not significantly decrease the price of gasoline or diesel, and does not address our very serious long-term energy situation.

According to leading experts, opening ANWR or other regions like the OCS to drilling would have no significant effect on our dependence on foreign oil or on the price of gas at the pump. Indeed, estimates are that drilling in ANWR would produce only the equivalent of a six month supply of oil, starting 10 years from now and continuing over about a 20 year production period. The Energy Information Association forecasts that opening up ANWR would only decrease the cost of gas 1-4 cents at the pump and only after 10-20 years. Under the current GOP proposal on the table, no energy would be produced until 2017 and it would be 2030 before full production comes on line, and when it does, it would have a minimal impact on prices. What the GOP leadership fails to mention is that 79% of America’s recoverable oil reserves are already currently open for drilling, that oil companies have not tapped millions of productive acres already open, and that the areas on the west and east coasts that could be important to drilling have no oil drilling infrastructure- no oil rigs, no pipelines to the shore, and no refineries at the end of those pipelines.

Opening up more areas to leasing will produce too little oil and only after 5 to 10 years or more - and there are no guarantees. There are more enduring options that can be developed just as quickly. In the same amount time, with the right investment and national energy plan, we could develop alternatives that improve efficiencies and create alternatives to secure our energy future. For example, based on the U.S.G.S. projections of the amount of oil in ANWR, an increase in the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE) standards for vehicles by about 2 miles per gallon saves more oil than ANWR could ever provide. Plug-in hybrid vehicles could be widely available within 10 years, and they can both double efficiencies and derive the majority of their fuel from the electric grid which is increasingly supplied by clean wind or geothermal or solar power. We also expect significant and growing production of advanced biofuels made from dedicated biomass energy crops, forest materials, and municipal wastes within10 years. All of these approaches provide a much more enduring approach to addressing our oil dependence problem. These are solutions that will last.

As Chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee in the 107th Congress, I added the first-ever energy title into the Farm Bill and in the 2008 Farm Bill, I included a much more ambitious energy title that will invest in new technologies to help meet our nation’s energy needs for years to come. The 2008 Farm Bill also closed the so-called “Enron loophole,” and restored the critical authority of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to oversee and regulate the trading of futures contracts that affect the price of oil, gasoline and other energy products. I am now

working to enact additional legislation that will further strengthen federal oversight and enforcement to keep energy markets fair, honest, and free of manipulation or price distortion. And I’ve backed legislation and Congressional oversight to make sure that the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice have all the power they need — and that they use it — to prevent, root out and prosecute collusion, price-fixing or price manipulation in markets for gasoline or other petroleum products.

And last December, Congress we passed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. This bill increases our Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) focusing on advanced biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol, creating thousands of economic opportunities in our rural communities. It also sets high efficiency standards for our appliances, buildings and utilities and raises mileage standards for our cars and light truck~ to 35 miles per gallon over the next 15 years. Again, it is important to note that by raising the fuel efficiency standards by just 2 mpg, we are saving more oil than would be produced by drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Also, this bill invests heavily in carbon capture and storage methods, which will allow us to capture the greenhouse gases from our coal power plants and it creates safeguards for consumers against price gouging during national emergencies.

There is more that Congress can and should do. I strongly supported a debate about S. 3044, the Consumer First Energy Act of 2008, and am disappointed that this legislation failed to be considered on a party line vote. This Act would amend the Internal Revenue Code to deny major oil producing companies a tax deduction on profits attributable to domestic production of oil, limit the ability of these companies to claim foreign tax credits, and would impose a 25% windfall profit tax on oil companies unless the invested the funds in renewable energy sources. The revenue raised from these actions would be placed in an Energy Independence and Security Trust Fund that would be used to expand the development of renewable energy sources.

Rest assured, I will continue to work on this vital issue to ensure that Iowans pay a fair price at the pump. In the meantime, there are many simple steps that individuals can take to reduce our gasoline bills. Inflating tires, combining trips whenever possible, driving with the speed limits and similar steps can all help to reduce miles or increase miles driven on a gallon of fuel.

Thank you again for your comments and sharing your frustration. Should you have any additional concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact my office.

Sincerely,

Tom Harkin

The part that scares me most is when he says “…I will continue to work on this…”.

Tom: Please.  Don’t.

Sphere: Related Content

Swamp Stomper Alert: Pelosi’s Pickens

Art Smith August 23rd, 2008

Nancy Pelosi Flexing Her MusclesIn this weekend’s Wall Street Journal, there is a report of an investment made by Nancy Pelosi and her husband.

They put somewhere between $50,000 and $100,000 into T. Boone Picken’s company, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.

At first blush, the relatively small amount (compared to millions of dollars in assets held by the Pelosis) would make most consider this to be a non-issue.  And by House Rules this is evidently not a conflict of interest. And besides, everyone can see that Natural Gas and Wind Energy are the future of America, right?

That shows you how well our politicians police themselves.

$50,000, $100,000, these are not small sums of money.  Mrs. Pelosi may bandy about billions of our tax dollars with little thought, and she may be a multi-millionaire, but this is still a LOT of money.

For her $50,000 (and who knows how much her friends have invested, or how much Mr. Pickens will be contributing to her campaign), I think we can now see why the San Francisco Democrat is attempting to strangle US citizens.  By continuing to encourage the run-ups in oil prices by locking out the availability of domestic oil resources, she is forcing America to bow to abandoning oil altogether.

It’s one thing to see the future and what is coming.  It’s quite another to be in a position to influence the future and be a financial beneficiary of the outcome.

The Swamp, which she had committed to clean up, has just gotten filthier and mored deadly than it ever was.  This is worse, in my opinion, than any previous acts by politicans to steer money to their own pockets or those of their friends.  It’s not just a no-bid contract.  It’s not just having advanced notice of confidential business deals.  This is an outright job of penning the American People like cattle into her chosen path for our future in order to line her pockets, her friends pockets, and build her power base.

And after all of the years of criticism of Bush and Cheney’s business connections to Haliburton in the earlier days of the Iraq War, I would have thought this kind of behaviour would be beyond Democratic Leaders.  I guess I am naive.

San Francisco, we have a problem.

I cannot imagine having a representative from Iowa who so flagrantly abandons their responsibility to protect the citizens they represent and the American People as a whole, and yet continue to have a political life.  I know that Californians are different, but this is starting to feel like the Twilight Zone.

Or perhaps they will see the light.  Perhaps, Mrs. Pelosi can worry less about the consequences of House Ethics action against her, and more about accountability where it really matters.  At the Ballot Box in November.

And out of the remainder of her portfolio, one must wonder what other connections are influencing her decisions and lining her pockets.  Or helping build her power base.

So much for cleaning out the Swamp.

Sphere: Related Content

Doing My Part

Art Smith August 15th, 2008

Last week I started taking my bicycle to work. It’s about 7.5 miles as the crow flies, and my shortest (and most difficult) route is about 8.5 miles… the longest (and easiest) route is 13 miles.  Downtown Des Moines is at a slightly lower elevation than the suburb of West Des Moines where I live, so mornings aren’t too bad, just a one tough hill, and afternoons, when taking the longer route, is okay except for one really big hill.

I realize that this is not a big deal… the point is NOT that I’m doing anything that great.

But I am saving about a gallon of gasoline each day I do this. That’s about $3.50 a day.  At least that covers my coffee money.

And if you know anything about my weight and health, you’ll recognize that 2 or 3 days a week of this is going to have a very positive impact on those areas.

Frankly, the majority of my motivation is health related, but the pont I really want to make is, I’m doing my part to help reduce our dependence on foriegn oil, now when is Nancy Pelosi going to do hers???

When is Leonard Boswell (my US House Representative) going to do his part???

When is Tom Harkin, the Democratic Senator from Iowa going to do his part???

My other Senator, Chuck Grassley, has been supporting the move to drill.  As are more Republicans.  And I know there are Democrats that want to but are too fearful of party reprisal to stand up and act.

We pay these folks far too much money to let them thumb their noses and ignore the will of the people, the need of the people, the need of our country to depart from the putrid dependence on foreign oil.  Now is the time to act!  Congress must act NOW or get the majority party voted out for holding us, the people they work for, hostage!

I hope that Obama doesn’t get the idea to push bike riding as the big solution.  I can see it now: “You know, if every American would ride their bicycle to work every day, we’d reduce our consumption of gasoline by ten billion gallons a year… “.  Of course, the math would be wrong, just like the tire inflation savings was itself inflated by bad math.

I’m pretty sure that everyone in Alaska cares so much about ANWR that they all bike to work anyway.

* * *

So today ends two full weeks of the GOP Protest against Democrats laziness.  Not only are Republican leaders NOT slowing down, there is more and more media attention turning to this historic event.  This link to John Boehner’s web site includes links to various media web sites, including (at the top!) our very own Des Moines Register.

I’ve heard about some people that have contacted their representatives multiple times since this began.  That’s a good idea!  I’m going to check in with mine again as well!

And lastly, the price of oil went up and down a bit this week, but still ended the week down 1%.  We keep this up, we won’t need to worry about our tire inflations any more, will we?

Sphere: Related Content

Next »