Log in    

Archive for the 'Joe Lieberman' Category

Why Do Oil Prices Continue To Drop?

Art Smith July 29th, 2008

Just when you thought you couldn’t afford to go on summer vacation, just when you thought the ONLY answer to rising gasoline prices was a “gas tax holiday“, just as various states are complaining they don’t have enough tax money collected to pay for road work, now oil prices fall to a 3 month low of 121.99 for US Crude and 122.71 for Brent Crude (at noon, central time), with no end in sight

You heard me, the analysts, the same ones that said we were likely stuck with $4-5 a gallon gasoline or higher by end of summer, are telling us that buying oil commodities is a bad deal right now, and even OPEC anticipates oil prices could fall down to as low as $70 a barrel.  That’s less than HALF the $147.27 high on July 11.

July 11 was a Friday.  The following Monday (July 14), President Bush dropped the presidential ban on off-shore drilling.  Even though dropping the ban had absolutely no impact on reality (no drills running yet), we’ve seen a consistent drop in the price of oil all but one or two days in the last two weeks.  We are now about $25 a barrel down from the high, or about 17%.  The MSM is desperately working at finding other ways to explain the drop in oil prices (I have YET to see a major news outlet attribute it to the emotional impact of Bush’s action), but the fact cannot be ignored… and Bush’s decision is not the only factor here, it’s the overwelming response of US citizens and the beginning of action by Congress to open up drilling domestically. 

People like Patty McIntosh of the Georgia Conseratory would have you believe that off-shore and other domestic drilling is not practical.  According to Patty:

Any hope to boost domestic supply from offshore sources is more than a decade away. And even if the U.S. energy picture looks the same 10 years from now, chances are we will not get much relief from these domestic sources. The estimated oil and gas offshore reserves could meet our current needs for only a matter of months.

Comments like this continue to ignore the facts… current prices on oil, and other commodities (or most any market-based financial product for that matter) are always most heavily impacted by what the future is perceived to be, not by the reality of what can be sold today.  And statements regarding the size and usefulness of any resource without real data (which no one has) is intended to manipulate everyone with the same false message we’ve heard for over a century: “there’s not enough to last us more than a short amount of time”.  Those statements are just baldface lies and anyone repeating them lacks credibility in my book.

The Heritage Foundation published an article today that concurs with our position.  It includes reference to an article that was submitted by Professor R. Morris Coats of Nicholls State University (in Louisiana) to the Energy Journal which appoarently (I have not seen the submitted article) provides demonstrable mathematics to support this conslusion.  The Energy Journal, however, rejected the article because it states what energy economists have known for decades, which is essentially the same message I’ve been hitting you with today.

Again, it’s not about how much domestic oil we can process at the refinery today, it’s how long we’re going to allow ourselves to be pushed around by foreign interests that is going to impact oil prices.  We’ve said this several time before here, and we’ll just keep lather, rinse, repeating it until everyone gets it.

The good news is that McCain is supporting off-shore and domestic drilling, we just need to get him off the dime and support drilling in ANWR.  John, you listening???

And our independent friend Joe Lieberman is now supporting domestic drilling.  We’re making headway, albeit slowly.

I sent the following message to my three congressmen (everyone should have 3 congresswomen/men, 1 representative and 2 senators).  You are welcome to copy and send the same message to yours… I strongly encourage you to contact your congresswomen/men immediately with a message to support domestic drilling.

Our dependence on foreign powers for sources of key raw materials, especially to provide fuel, is becoming untenable.  I completely understand the concerns of those that want to protect valuable natural habitats and areas of clean untarnished beauty throughout our country.  However, relying on foreign concerns who are intent upon taking advantage of our need for energy resources is simply not working, and in many ways, is starting to make the US seem unintelligent in its dealings and inability to manage its dependence on foreign markets by closing its own internal access to the same resources.  I am anxious to see us build and leverage cleaner solutions for energy, and support any efforts to improve these technologies.  However, we do, and will continue to for a long time, need access to oil, and we need to keep the money spent on this oil within our own economy instead of pouring it out on the rest of the world and diluting its value.

Please support efforts to open up domestic drilling, including off-shore and ANWR.  Please become a leader in a bipartisan effort to make access to domestic oil resources a reality as soon as possible.

Thank you for taking the time to read this, and thank you for your fine work!

Sincerely,

Art Smith

Don’t delay.  The sooner Congress knows what we want, the sooner they will act.  Representatives LinkSenators Link.

Other bloggers speaking to this topic include: BItsBlog (who predicted a mid-summer drop in the price of crude), PowerLine, and hopefully the Sphere link below will have others as well.

Sphere: Related Content

Lieberman and YouTube

Art Smith June 29th, 2008

Wow!  I totally missed the Lieberman confrontation with YouTube (owned by Google) until it was mentioned in an email exchange I had today.

From CNN:

In a Monday [May 19, 2008] letter to Eric Schmidt, chief executive officer of Google, Lieberman asked that YouTube “implement its own policy against this offensive material,” by removing the videos. Lieberman, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, also wants YouTube staffers to have a system that will prevent the video from reappearing.

I am a bit amazed, as I did not think he would advocate this kind of censorship.  If I understand his position, I think he’s wrong.  I like Lieberman mostly because of his willingness to stand up to his party and be his own man.  I suspect he is trying to get on conservatives’ good side with this approach, but I think he will find he’s barking up the wrong tree.  I’m glad that YouTube reacted the way they did.

Again from CNN:

YouTube said Monday on its blog that it had removed a “number of videos” from its site after examining several videos that Lieberman’s staff said “violated YouTube’s Community Guidelines.”

The videos that were removed “depicted gratuitous violence, advocated violence, or used hate speech,” YouTube said.

However, “Most of the videos, which did not contain violent or hate speech content, were not removed because they do not violate our Community Guidelines.”

It deeply saddens me to see such horrific violence or gratuitous sexual content so readily available to children and adults in our world.  I do believe that the easy availability of this kind of content will have a deteriorating impact on our society.  However, I don’t think the answer is to use the government to control it.  As a society, we can choose to manage it in ways that are not destructive, convince adults of the undesirable personal and societal impacts of the content,  and train our children to be discerning about what they consume.

This is not the government’s responsibility.  Quite the opposite.  The minute we allow the government to decide what is appropriate content to view, we slide down the path of political censorship and government media management.

Probably the one distinct exception is Child Pornography.  Only because in order to produce it, you need to be exposing a child to abuse.

That said, we at The Conservative Reader reserve the right (as others do as well) to censor our web site to ensure it is suitable for visitors of all ages.  That means we watch for the use of offensive words, we don’t intentionally link to a site with pornography or gratuitous violence or the kind of language we restrict on our site.   This is not censorship… it is our own right under the First Amendment to exert this type of control over the content we provide here.

And YouTube has the same right.  Take that away and you might as well chuck the whole Bill of Rights.

My thanks to Richard Perlman for pointing this story out to me.

Sphere: Related Content

The Democrats Are In Disarray

Art Smith March 30th, 2008

This had been a disconcerting election year so far, and certainly we still have a long road ahead, but the state of the Democratic Party, and the latest Gallup Poll, are giving me reason to smile today.

Democrats really don’t know what they want any longer.  They’ve found themselves stuck with either a chronic liar, or worse yet, a huge unknown.

Hillary has now found herself in the position where many party leaders are finding it difficult to back her up on her “misstatement” about running from sniper fire while visiting Bosnia as First Lady (Peggy Noonan has a great assessment of Clinton’s current political state of affairs).  It’s interesting to watch the party suddenly stare in shell-shocked disbelief.

And although Obama is ahead of Clinton in the polls and in delegate counts (and likely Super Delegate support),  he still suffers from multiple issues that will dog him through the rest of this campaign:

  • His relationship with his former pastor
  • His lack of any meaningful legislative work
  • His lack of foreign policy experience
  • His apparent lack of patriatism
  • The fact that most people really don’t know anything about him

And, at a time when many Republicans have given up any hope of retaining the Presidency, Gallup shows McCain ahead of Obama (not by a lot, but ahead nonetheless).

Democrats continue to have moral failure after moral failure. after moral failure.  It seems like Democrats can’t stay out of personal trouble (or at least, have a hard time keeping it a secret).

Even in Iowa, the Democrats in the General Assembly are at odds with the Democratic Governor (David Yepson in the Des Moines Register today rightly says that Governor Culver’s stand against unions on this topic will serve him well into the next election).

Meanwhile, the worst thing I’ve heard about McCain lately is that he has bad teeth.  I don’t know what I would have done wthout that critical alert.
Joe Lieberman is apparently supporting McCain.

But finally, Hillary is running out of cash.  And now is being discussed as a possible Governor for New York to try to clear up the mess after the moral failings of Spitzer and Paterson.  Something about that idea just doesn’t make sense to me.  I’m more favorable to the Giuliani idea.

This is what happens when Democrats are in power.  It would be entertaining if it didn’t have a real on people’s lives and our freedoms.

Hat tips to Memeorandum and DavidL at Bitsblog.

Sphere: Related Content

Lieberman Explains Support for McCain

Art Smith March 17th, 2008

Joe Lieberman, Independent Senator from Connecticut (although, oh, he does still caucus with the Democrats in the Senate) explains his position supporting John McCain today in the Stamford Advocate. Lieberman says McCain is “really a reformer” who is not bogged down by partisan politics.

You’ll recall that in January Lieberman and McCain co-authored a well-written piece that was published in the Wall Street Journal regarding the success of the troop surge in Iraq. Lieberman is co-chair of McCain’s Connecticut campaign along with US Representative Christopher Shays (R-Connecticut).

At this point in the election process, it is important, in my opinion, for conservatives to support the Republican Party, including the candidate for President. I support McCain in this election, while I will still continue to promote conservative positions even when they contradict McCain and/or the Party positions.

I have a lot of respect for Joe Lieberman, and commend his work in supporting bipartisan efforts to accomplish the critical tasks at hand. I find it dubious, however, for him to play both sides of the aisle so easily. Democrats are making a good show of distancing themselves from him in the midst of his support for McCain, and perhaps he is simply trying to sort out his philosophical views, with motion to the right, but I would find it much easier to entertain his support if he would completely sever his ties with the Democrats and make a solid commitment to stand with Republicans not just on the issues that he already supports, but as a solid party member and promoter.

I suspect that Joe’s mind is a bit unclear due to McCain’s tendency to lean left. McCain and Lieberman are likely able to work together more because the two of them already operate in the middle, with their foundations from each side. Compromise of the sort found in moderate political philosophy is beneficial when trying to bring the best of both worlds together, but let’s face it: when you must do what’s right on a national scale, you have to think about the long-term implications of your vision and decisions. The left will never do this well because they are always solving for the moment (not unlike the business world, which have lead to the problems we are having with the economy right now). The right will tend toward solving for the long-term, ensuring growth, discipline and a vision for future decades to ensure stability.

Although I appreciate good legislation born from bipartisan efforts, I cannot support the idea that there can ever be a coalition voice between the parties. The goals of the right and left, represented (albeit not consistently) within the Republican and Democratic parties, are substantively different and frequently at odds with each other. Attempting to draw the two together as if they could operate as one is a Pollyanna dream. And frankly, where there is value on the left that is being missed on the right, I think it much more valuable to go through the effort of discussing the positions and reaching the best conclusion together. The discourse on issues does substantially more to help everyone understand the various positions, impacts and risks much better than participants from both sides reaching a hasty compromise because “bipartisanship” is considered the panacea. It’s hard work to talk issues out. But talk them out we must lest we lose our way.

As the article in the Advocate states, Lieberman is still sitting on the left with regard to taxes and the economy, supporting both the unlikely value of the economic stimulus package and higher taxes. And seeing that, it’s hard to think that Joe’s party jumping is anything less than an effort to play both sides in order to keep his job in Washington and pedal his influence into the White House, even if by proxy.

Update:  I just checked, and I have to give Joe credit, he did vote in favor of the moratorium on earmarks last week.

Sphere: Related Content

The Surge Worked!

Art Smith January 10th, 2008

In a WSJ commentary this morning, John McCain and Joe Lieberman reflect on the anniversary of Bush’s announcement to implement the 2007 Iraq Troop Surge, and made an excellent case for the surge and for continued managed presence in Iraq, and for dependency on General Petraeus’ skills to reduce the troop levels appropriately in the near future:

Every American should feel a debt of gratitude to Gen. Petraeus and the great American troops fighting under him for us. This gratitude is due not simply for the extraordinary progress they have accomplished in Iraq, but for what they have taught us about ourselves.

If the mismanagement of the Iraq war from 2003 to 2006 exposed our government’s capacity for incompetence, Gen. Petraeus’ leadership this past year, and the conduct of the troops under his command, have reminded us of our capacity for the wisdom, the courage and the leadership that has always rallied our nation to greatness.

As Americans, we have repeatedly done what others said was impossible. Gen. Petraeus and his troops are doing that again in Iraq today.

I appreciate the words of support from these two men… there is no doubt that the surge has been a tremendous success and that we are winning in this conflict. I support bringing our troops home as soon as possible, but possible has to include successful. We cannot have the opinion of Congress a year ago…

In Congress, opposition to the surge from antiwar members was swift and severe. They insisted that Iraq was already “lost,” and that there was nothing left to do but accept our defeat and retreat.

A left-leaning Congress is always going to think with their hearts… I commend them for caring about the lives of people in the short term, but we must always keep the long term view in front of us because that’s where our legacy is born.

Obviously, this missive provides McCain with some substantive credibility in two regards: 1) A conservative perspective on the effort in Iraq and 2) an ability to work with those that come from an area closer to the left. Lieberman’s independent party affiliation notwithstanding, McCain may really be able to do what Obama only claims to want to do in working with both sides of the aisle. Something to think about.

If McCain is nominated, can Joe end up as VP? <– That’s a joke! (or is it…)

Hat Tip to Memeorandum.  Also blogging is Blue Crab Blvd.

Sphere: Related Content

View blog authority View blog reactions BlogBurst.com